Economic Impact Report • March 2026

We MatterMyeloma Matters

A comprehensive analysis of the economic, social and human burden of multiple myeloma in Australia

$7.16B
Total Annual Economic Impact

Prepared by HTAnalysts for Myeloma Australia • March 2026

Navigation

Contents

1Joe's Story
2Foreword
3Multiple Myeloma at a Glance
4Total Cost Overview
5Introduction
6Methods
7Direct Costs
8Indirect Costs
9Wellbeing Costs
10Comparisons to Other Conditions
11Recommendations
12National Myeloma Strategy
13Conclusion
Dedication

Joe's Story

A Life Lived in Advocacy

Joe was 36 when he was diagnosed with myeloma after returning from a camping trip with sudden, severe rib pain. A CT scan revealed extensive bone damage, with his neck and spine described as looking like "Swiss cheese." In the short time since his diagnosis, Joe has undergone six lines of treatment, experienced a pulmonary embolism that caused a heart attack, endured multiple bouts of pneumonia, and suffered seven spinal fractures from his neck to his lower back.

Joe has channelled his experience into advocacy, supporting others with myeloma and finding purpose in helping those facing the same journey. Just five short years since diagnosis, at the age of 41, Joe has now entered end of life care. This report is dedicated to Joe and all people living with myeloma. They are who we are striving to find the cure for.

We are a leading voice on the global myeloma stage. A cure is within reach NOW, but it will not happen without sustained investment. The myeloma community in Australia and around the world deserves nothing less.

Professor Simon Harrison Chair, Myeloma Australia Medical and Scientific Advisory Group (MSAG)

In the spirit of reconciliation, this report acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of Country throughout Australia and their connections to land, sea and community. We value Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, traditions, views and ways of life, and pay our respects to Elders past and present.

Foreword

A Message from Myeloma Australia

Multiple myeloma may be considered an uncommon cancer, but its impact is profound and widely underestimated. This report shows that the economic impact of multiple myeloma in Australia is $7.16 billion each year, making it one of the most costly cancers on a per person basis. For the more than 22,000 Australians living with multiple myeloma, this incurable disease brings lifelong treatment, repeated relapse, and a heavy physical, emotional and financial burden.

Crucially, most of this cost sits outside hospital and pharmaceutical budgets. It is borne by patients and carers through lost quality of life, premature mortality, reduced workforce participation and ongoing caregiving. These impacts are rarely captured in traditional health system reporting, yet they define the lived experience of multiple myeloma.

Despite accounting for only around 1% of cancers, multiple myeloma has one of the lowest survival rates, the highest annual healthcare cost per patient, and a disproportionate wellbeing impact. The cost of inaction is measured not just in dollars, but in lives and independence lost.

This report also points to a clear path forward. Earlier diagnosis, equitable access to the most effective treatments, and a coordinated national investment in research and data can deliver better outcomes for patients and strong returns for society.

Myeloma Australia believes Australians living with multiple myeloma deserve better. This report provides the evidence base for a national coordinated response to change the future of this disease.

Jeff Browne
Chairman
Mark Henderson
Chief Executive Officer
Overview

Multiple Myeloma at a Glance

Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable form of blood cancer that arises from plasma cells in the bone marrow. It leads to various health complications including a weakened immune system, bone destruction and reduced kidney function.

22,000
People living with myeloma in Australia
348,293
People living with MGUS or Smouldering MM
2,755
People diagnosed with MM in 2025
10%
New cases in people younger than 50
1,100+
Deaths due to MM in Australia each year
27%
People with MM who die within 18 months of diagnosis
61%
5-year relative survival rate for myeloma
$300K+
Cost per person including healthcare and wellbeing costs
Economic Overview

The Cost of Multiple Myeloma

The total annual economic burden of multiple myeloma in Australia is $7.16 billion, spanning direct healthcare costs, indirect costs to patients and carers, and profound wellbeing costs.

🏥
$1.41B
Direct healthcare costs
💼
$0.16B
Indirect costs — travel, productivity, carers
💛
$5.60B
Wellbeing costs — quality of life, premature mortality
Annual Cost Breakdown
Total: $7.16 billion per year
Background

Introduction

Multiple myeloma is a relapsing-remitting cancer, meaning people may experience periods where the disease is under control (remission), followed by times when it becomes active again (relapse). Treatments are often delivered continuously, either actively treating MM or as a maintenance program when the disease is stable.

MM has one of the lowest life expectancies of all blood cancers. Around 27% of Australians diagnosed with MM die within 18 months of diagnosis. The 5-year relative survival is only 61%. Over the last few years, the MM growth rate has increased by approximately 30%.

The number of people being diagnosed with MM each year is expected to almost double by 2043. Nearly 10% of people diagnosed with MM are younger than 50, highlighting the need for greater awareness among younger patients and their doctors.

Myeloma Disease Spectrum
People affected across the continuum
Although MM accounts for only about 1% of all cancers in Australia, spending on pharmaceutical treatments for MM represents 11% of all PBS spend on cancer medicines in 2024-25.
Methodology

Methods

This report focuses on the healthcare and non-healthcare costs experienced by people living with MM, their families, and the Australian Government. Costs and savings were estimated for 2024. Data were sourced from the PBS, Medicare Benefits Schedule online, and relevant literature where appropriate. Costs sourced from the literature were inflated to 2024 dollars using the RBA inflation calculator.

The MM prevalence is estimated based on an extrapolation of incidence data and survival rates, drawing on data from Myeloma Australia's national patient and carer database, complemented by insights from leading experts in the field, including the MSAG. This approach contrasts with other published sources, which may substantially undercount patient numbers because they depend on registries that can be incomplete, may not capture cases in rural and regional areas, and often lag in reflecting improvements in survival rates.

The approach used in this analysis relies on published sources for each of the included costs, prevalence and utilisation, rather than primary data collection. Results are therefore limited by the availability and quality of the underlying data.

🏥

Direct Costs

  • Costs incurred prior to diagnosis
  • Cost of MM treatments
  • Cost of autologous stem cell transplant
  • Cost of disease and symptom management
  • Cost of allied health services
💼

Indirect Costs

  • Travel and accommodation for care
  • Productivity loss
  • Cost to carers
💛

Wellbeing Costs

  • Quality of life loss of the patient
  • Premature mortality
  • Quality of life loss of the carer
Burden of Myeloma

Direct Costs: $1.41 Billion

Direct costs represent actual financial and health system expenses associated with diagnosis, treatment, ongoing disease and symptom management, and allied health services.

72.2%
$1.02 Billion
Disease & Symptom Management
18.1%
$254.3 Million
MM Drug Treatments
5.3%
$75.0 Million
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant
2.7%
$37.5 Million
Allied Health Services
1.7%
$24.4 Million
Pre-Diagnosis Costs
Direct Cost Composition
$1.41B total in 2024

Average specialists consulted before haematologist referral

3

People with MM under 70 who receive an ASCT

76%
Disease & Symptom Management: $1.02 Billion
Hospitalisations$784.9M
Ongoing Monitoring & Management$99.5M
Infection Prevention & Management$49.9M
Emergency Department Visits$47.0M
Intravenous Immunoglobulin$44.3M
Bone Pain & Fracture Prevention$33.3M
Peripheral Neuropathy Management$2.1M
Burden of Myeloma

Indirect Costs: $160.9 Million

The indirect costs are the non-health system costs for patients and their caregivers, associated with travel and accommodation for care, productivity loss and caregiver burden.

Indirect Cost Breakdown
$160.9 million total in 2024
$66.2M
Productivity losses from reduced employment. Among those not working, 48.2% reported their unemployment was due to the illness.
$61.0M
Caregiver burden including lost income ($14.6M) and grief-related productivity loss ($45.4M). 90% of people with MM have at least one informal caregiver.
$33.8M
Travel and accommodation costs. 2% of patients report declining treatment because of travel time.
Burden of Myeloma

Wellbeing Costs: $5.60 Billion

Wellbeing costs are the largest component of the total burden, encompassing quality of life loss for patients and carers, and the costs of premature mortality. These are the costs least often captured in traditional health reporting.

Wellbeing Cost Composition
$5.60 billion total
$4.4B
Premature mortality. Based on 18,140 years of life lost in people living with MM.
$630.6M
Carer quality of life loss. 2,547 quality adjusted life years lost for caregivers of people with MM.
$520.4M
Patient quality of life loss. 2,124 years lived with disability in people living with MM.

Our community continues to grow in numbers and in voice. For too long, the myeloma community has had no voice. We are changing that and so will this report. They cannot be ignored. We need action and we need it fast.

Mark HendersonChief Executive Officer, Myeloma Australia
Context

Comparisons to Other Conditions

While the total burden of MM may appear smaller than more common cancers due to lower prevalence, on a per-patient basis, myeloma has the highest cost of any cancer in Australia. The vast majority of the MM burden falls outside direct healthcare spending, meaning it is routinely underestimated in conventional analyses.

Cost Per Person Compared to Other Cancers
Total cost per patient including healthcare and wellbeing costs
Prevalence vs Cost Per Person
Smaller patient populations can still carry disproportionately high per-person costs

Underestimating the burden of MM by focusing primarily on healthcare costs distorts prioritisation and resourcing across the system, leading to inadequate funding for patient and carer supports as well as lower levels of research investment. This also undermines eligibility for income protection, carer payments, travel and accommodation assistance, and workplace flexibility programs — leaving patients and families to absorb sustained financial and quality-of-life losses.

I lost my husband Tony to myeloma ten years ago. Now I've been diagnosed with it and facing an uncertain future. Whilst I am strong and optimistic, I have to be. We as a community demand action and permanent change.

Marlo McCarthyMyeloma Australia Patient Ambassador

I put my name and my voice to raise awareness throughout the Australian community. Slowly but surely more people are understanding the challenge that myeloma brings to our community. The impact is huge. The report shows this.

Sandy RobertsMyeloma Australia Ambassador
Action Required

Recommendations

The findings of this analysis support three key recommendations as crucial to improving MM treatment and care in Australia. Focusing on Greater Awareness, Access to Treatment, and Research Funding will not only improve the lives of those living with MM but also strengthen processes across the healthcare system.

1

Greater Awareness

A major gap in the MM landscape is the lack of public and clinical awareness of MM as a disease overall. Despite advances in treatment, MM remains less recognised than other cancers. As a relatively rare cancer, accounting for 1% of all cancers in Australia and often presenting with non-specific symptoms, diagnosis is often delayed until the late stages.

Modelling shows that in the year before diagnosis, people with MM experience excess costs totalling $24.4 million. These figures highlight the urgent need to shorten the time to diagnosis by improving GP and allied health understanding of the early symptoms of MM, and by increasing public awareness of potential warning signs.

Greater awareness of early-stage conditions such as MGUS and Smouldering MM is essential, as they can progress silently, with minimal to no symptoms. Early identification enables closer monitoring, timely intervention, and the potential to delay or prevent progression to active MM.

Action: A national awareness program should prioritise GP and allied health training and community education to support early recognition and referral.

2

Access to Treatment

Significant gaps in access to treatment limit Australians' ability to benefit from the latest and most effective therapies. Although treatment options for MM have rapidly evolved, delays, restricted use due to PBS listing constraints, and inconsistent clinical practice persist. As a result, many patients cycle through older, less effective therapies before accessing newer options that could offer longer remission, better quality of life, and improved survival.

A comprehensive review of current treatment sequencing is recommended to determine optimal treatment pathways. MM treatments account for 11% of total PBS spending on cancer medicines, highlighting the need to ensure these resources deliver the greatest benefit.

Earlier access to advanced therapies can reduce premature mortality, minimise quality of life loss, and decrease overall treatment and symptom management costs. This is particularly important given the total wellbeing cost ($5.6 billion) and the direct costs of treatment and disease management ($1.3 billion) estimated in this analysis.

3

Research Funding

Myeloma Australia's MSAG estimates that a coordinated, national investment of $100 million would be sufficient to find a cure for MM. Such an investment would reap immeasurable benefit for the MM community and result in significant returns for the Australian Government and society more broadly.

Despite major advances in treatment and survival, MM remains an incurable cancer, highlighting a critical gap in Australia's research landscape. Progress towards a cure is delayed by the absence of a unified national plan, limited Australian-specific data and the incomplete use of real-world evidence such as the Myeloma and Related Diseases Registry (MRDR) to support decision-making.

Additional funding would enable world-leading Australian clinicians to participate in more investigator-led trials, strengthen participation in international research collaborations, translate discoveries into practice, and enhance data collection.

Implementation

The National Myeloma Strategy (2026-2031)

The National Myeloma Strategy (2026-2031) has been developed in direct response to the findings of this economic analysis. It is a structured five-pillar reform agenda designed to reduce mortality, reduce avoidable system cost, and build a coordinated national pathway towards a cure. The project return materially exceeds the required investment.

$132MTotal Investment Required (5 Years)
$302MProjected Annual Economic Benefit
$1.5BProjected Five-Year Economic Benefit
PillarInvestmentExpected Annual Savings5-Year Potential Savings
Cure Pathway Program$100 million$222 million$1.1 billion
Best Therapy First Reform$3 million$39 million$195 million
National Awareness & Early Diagnosis Strategy$12 million$19.3 million$96.5 million
Patient and Carer Support Reform$5 million$8 million$40 million
Data and Registry Reform$12 million$14 million$70 million
TOTAL$132 million$302 million$1.5 billion

The Five Pillars

1

Coordinated National Cure Pathway

Premature mortality represents the single largest economic impact. The Cure Pathway Program supports investigator-led trials, precision medicine acceleration, a national trial coordination hub and structured sequencing research.

$100M
Investment
$1.1B
5-Year Benefit
2

Best Therapy First: Treatment Access Reform

Delayed access to optimal therapies leads to preventable relapse cycles and higher hospital utilisation. Policy reforms include a 12-month PBAC sequencing review and reduction in TGA/PBS approval lag by 30%.

$3M
Investment
$195M
5-Year Benefit
3

Early Diagnosis and Awareness Reform

MM symptoms are often non-specific, leading to delayed recognition. Late diagnosis contributes to renal impairment, fracture risk and avoidable admissions. Actions include GP education modules and referral pathway reform.

$12M
Investment
$96.5M
5-Year Benefit
4

Specialist Nursing and Carer Support Reform

Access to specialist myeloma nurses is inconsistent nationally. Carer productivity loss is $45.4M annually. Program components include specialist nurse expansion and regional travel subsidy support.

$5M
Investment
$40M
5-Year Benefit
5

National Data and Registry Reform

MM data remains incompletely linked across clinical and reimbursement systems, limiting policy precision. Objectives include 95% registry coverage, real-time MBS/PBS linkage, annual outcome reporting and AI-enabled analytics. A 1% improvement in treatment sequencing efficacy equates to $70 million in five-year benefit.

$12M
Investment
$70M
5-Year Benefit
Summary

Conclusion

Multiple myeloma continues to impose a substantial burden on individuals, families and the Australian healthcare system with a total economic impact of approximately $7.16 billion per year. Despite notable advances in treatment that have improved survival and quality of life, MM remains an incurable, chronic disease requiring lifelong management.

Direct costs, including those associated with diagnosis, treatment and symptom management, exceed $1.0 billion annually. When indirect costs of more than $160.9 million and wellbeing costs exceeding $5.6 billion are also considered, the overall economic impact increases dramatically.

The results also present a clear opportunity: investments that lead to improved quality of life and reduced mortality in people with MM can lead to significant savings for patients and society. Even modest improvements, achievable through earlier diagnosis, timely access to new therapies, and targeted research, could deliver tens to hundreds of millions in value annually.

The cost of inaction is too great. MM requires a national, coordinated response focused on awareness and early diagnosis, equitable access to treatment, and investment in research and data collection.

Abbreviations

AIHWAustralian Institute of Health and Welfare
MSAGMedical and Scientific Advisory Group
AR-DRGAustralian Refined Diagnosis Related Groups
NDMMNewly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma
ASCTAutologous Stem Cell Transplant
PBSPharmaceutical Benefits Scheme
GPGeneral Practitioner
RRMMRelapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
HRQoLHealth-Related Quality of Life
SMMSmouldering Multiple Myeloma
IHACPAIndependent Health and Aged Care Pricing Authority
YLDsYears Lived with Disability
MGUSMonoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance
YLLsYears of Potential Life Lost
MIFMyeloma Impact Fund
MMMultiple Myeloma
Research Sponsors

Myeloma Australia thanks Johnson & Johnson and GSK for their financial support for this research, given without any pre-condition or editorial input.

Johnson&Johnson
GSK